Culture

Is Your DEI Plan Taking Shape?

Photo by Christina @ wocintechchat.com on Unsplash

Photo by Christina @ wocintechchat.com on Unsplash

With the past 15 months behind us, we are starting to see some normality return. Face-to-face schooling, plans for fall sport revivals, women being able to return to work as the disproportionate labor(s) are deputed elsewhere… But we are also seeing a social shift: A new political climate, an increase of awareness about the stark contrast in opportunity for those underrepresented at work, and the pieces falling into place about the essentiality for defined and persistent DEI efforts within corporations.

As we re-enter physical working spaces, albeit with a slow and steady return, what can companies do to craft a thoughtful and meaningful Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion program?

First, we must take the time to understand the scope in needs of employees. As an example, I found in my recent research that working adults were far more likely to opt for time off, flexible schedules, and family leave before hoping for salary increases and other perks. The key here is to seek out responses from the collective of the organization, uncovering the concerns, needs, and opportunities for re-writing the norms of company culture as it pertains to inclusive decision-making. Case in point: Whom you seek out to answer these questions must be a diverse set of people within the company. A combination of qualitative and quantitative measures can provide the data you seek for determining what changes must take place, and then there needs to be a way to convey how in fact they will occur.

As a thought-starter:

  • What are your representation goals for the coming year?

  • How do you address overt internal discrimination?

  • What can people do when they feel they are a part of an out-group?

  • How are you addressing pay inequity?

If you haven’t considered the answers to these questions, it is time to do so. Realize also that it is one thing to inquire and it is another to act. The intent must be to institute change for better belonging and psychological safety and must also be paired with transparency. How are you going to reach that end goal? Being forthright about how to uncover pay inequity, for example, will demonstrate a commitment to all people within the organization (and a great place to start is a pay audit). Be upfront about the process, the timeline, and the intended outcomes. How will the inequities be corrected?

If you’re not sure – let’s brainstorm! There is only an opportunity for improvement ahead.  

Creating Confidence Through Action

Photo by sydney Rae on Unsplash

Photo by sydney Rae on Unsplash

Nearly every single person can relate to an experience of feeling intimidated. And what’s important to realize is that intimidation can quickly lead to negative self-talk, which can quickly lead to hesitation, second-guessing, and depleted confidence.

The best way to counter insecurities — or the fear of inferiority— is to practice mindfulness and actions to create confidence. Confidence can be increased and most notably, it can be increased in adulthood.

Research shows that women tend to be less confident and undervalue their competence, while men tend to overshoot their competence, which is directly linked to their high levels of self-confidence. The short and sweet psychological reasoning of it is this: girls observe the benefits received from people-pleasing and good behavior at a young age. They also see boys rough-housing and getting into trouble. This conditioning leads our girls to take fewer risks and consequently teaches them little about resilience in the process. The kicker? Resilience is a confidence builder. Conversely, boys get daily doses of resilience as they learn to accept criticism and consequence.

If you are a man you may think of the times you were reprimanded growing up. If you are a woman, you may relate to the narrative of ceasing “poor behavior” to keep your good grades, reputation, and likability intact. But what is seen to be important in childhood, such as being a well-behaved child, actually can set the stage for less success in adulthood. Research shows that confidence matters as much as competence to achieve promotions, raises, and even contentedness.

This means that as a people manager, we must encourage all within our teams to explore their confidence and guide the process. In order to create an inclusive climate, leading to better team cohesion, innovation, and productivity, discussing confidence is important.

You will likely find that based on the psychological undertones just briefly discussed here, women will benefit most from confidence creation, and men will learn their predispositions — demonstrating to all team members that there is room for personal growth and professional development. Consider sharing not only the science behind confidence (more can be read about the confidence gap by authors Katty Kay and Claire Shipman) but provide the tools to your team to practice confidence builders.

As a starting point, ask team members what confidence means to them. More specifically, what does a “confident you” look like? ​

Second, ask team members what this confident person behaves like and what this person accomplishes.

Third, what does this person look like, and how does he or she present themself?

Envisioning what ​it is a person wants provides an opportunity for clarity. It also presents an opportunity to recognize areas for growth. In addition to this grounding visualization exercise, provide team members with resources — such as confidence tips and education. I provide weekly confidence hacks here on my company’s Instagram page.

Cheers to a more confident you — have a good week.

Is There Validity to 360° Reviews?

Photo by Ben Sweet on Unsplash

Photo by Ben Sweet on Unsplash

Research shows that leaders can use feedback from 360° review methods to understand and improve behavioral tendencies. Feedback is, after all, a powerful way to capture the scope of perspective about an individual (which may or may not be favorable). However, the opportunity lies in what people -- or better yet, the organization -- chooses to do with that feedback. 

There is a surprising set of data that shows underlying flaws with how these 360° reviews are being utilized and facilitated. Regrettably, most companies are missing the mark. Corporations that opt to forego regular performance discourse throughout the year, and instead rely solely on the annual review for an overarching picture of one person, can be misleading. The absence of consistent discussion about behavior and performance creates a black box; what will people say about me this year? Over time, employees and managers alike start to begrudge the process and disregard the results. What was meant to be used as an educational tool has instead turned into a villain.

Thus, it is not necessarily the tools corporations use for employee feedback and performance assessments, but rather the foundational expectations that are set. 

If you use a 360° tool, evaluate the internal perception of its worth. Are people afraid of it? Dread it? Think it’s the best thing since sliced bread? Regardless, you must consider the below in order for the process to be effective. 

It is imperative to: 

1) Have a plan in place for post-review feedback in order for said feedback to be acted upon and used. Without a plan (a coach, journal installments, 1:1 meetings, etc.) information is likely to only be received and never acted upon. Without effort, there will be no behavioral change.

2) Have a standard practice in place to ensure a) response confidentiality and b) standards of conduct. At times, feedback may not be authentically provided if staff believe their responses will come back to "haunt them" later on. Further, a review of another person is not the time to hash out personal conflict. All team members must understand this distinction or results will be skewed.

3) Make sure top leadership does not downplay its validity or importance. Without leadership backing the process, it's a waste of time. Not only is it time-consuming and costly, but it's also necessary to have a trained individual assessing the information, helping extract positive feedback (not just negative feedback that could possibly overwhelm and alienate the recipient). 

It’s also essential to be clear about the purpose of the 360-degree review while also coaching the staff on what to expect from the process. It's been found that the best 360 assessments focus on talents and capabilities first, prior to delving into areas that need improving. These are all components that assist in making the review process more beneficial and allow leaders to learn, as well as fine-tune their behaviors and attitudes. 

Unsure of where to begin with how to effectively get and give feedback? It may be time for a cultural climate temperature!

Why Investing in Managers is an Active Equality Effort

Image by Charles Forerunner, Unsplash

Image by Charles Forerunner, Unsplash

In my recent research, I found that women were conclusively more affected than men during COVID-19, a predicament that continues to prevail and evolve, but a close second on the scale of most affected were parents (male and female) as a consequence of managerial frameworks or lack thereof.

Managers and broader corporations as a whole who refused to recognize the complexities of COVID-19, and the associated detrimental factors, compounded the problems for parents specifically. In many cases, organizations made it so difficult for employees to co-exist in their new reality of balancing the care for children with careers, that one parent was forced out of their jobs: mothers. This should not come as a shock based on the knowledge that over two million women are or have considered taking a leave of absence or leaving the workforce entirely due to the COVID-19 crisis, but it should be shocking.

The reason for this forced departure is “simply” based on the fact that what we think about care and who is responsible for it is faulty. This is where the concept of Default to Responsibility comes in and is a newfound necessity for organizations to understand. 

While the research shows that some corporations directed their managers to be flexible, they did not define what flexibility was or how to achieve it. Further, it was found in a Riveter study that only six percent recorded their employer changing benefits to help parents during the pandemic. Six percent! An absence of empathy paired with clear expectations for managers to follow created a climate filled with tension, mistrust, and lower productivity. Innovation flattened, stress increased, and now corporations face the costly reality of replacing the women they lost. For each woman who departed, organizations can expect to pay six to nine months of the individual’s salary to replace her. 

Managers must receive adequate education and preparation for how to be steadfast amidst uncertain environments. Inclusive climates require effort, knowledge, observation, and consistent discourse. Without the constant efforts of improving climate -- a very feasible and reasonable process for managers to achieve -- it will unravel at the seams as pressures supersede values. An unsustainable approach and one that ensures inequality.

THOUGHT STARTERS:

If you are a manager --
Consider value-based leading. What is one of your core values? Why is it relevant to your leadership?

If you are a governor of a corporation -- 
What resources are you giving to your managers to create inclusive climates that spark higher engagement, minimal turnover, and superior problem-solving?

First posted on LinkedIn.